The
following letter points to the ongoing tension between football codes
resulting from the annual processes of ground allocation. The
correspondent fears that a Hobart footy competition might not get the
ground it desires because another sport (soccer, or Lacrosse) will be
able to offer more money for rental. The correspondent also argues that
because of the greater participation level in footy then it should
receive priority.
THE SUBURBAN SPORTS GROUND.
To the Editor of "The Mercury."
Sir,
- It is usual, I believe, for the Cricket Association at the beginning
of the football season to call for tenders for the use of the Suburban
sports ground, and this area is usually rented by the highest tenderer.
Those who are likely to try to obtain the use of it this year are the
Suburban Association, the British Football Association, and possibly
the Lacrosse Association and the H.J.F.A. I should like to point out a
few reasons why the Suburban Association have a claim on the
consideration of the governing body when the tenders are sent in.
During
the last five years a team from this association won the Davies shield
four times, showing by their easy victories that the class of football
played is of a high older, in spite of the fact that they have had a
very poor playing space.
All the schoolboys who
graduate for the top ground get their preliminary experience with the
Suburban Association, and boys have never yet had a fair show on the
Lindisfarne ground.
Thirdly, since over 60 per cent,
of the young men of Hobart obtain their recreation from the Australian
game, I think that that game should have some preference over lacrosse
and soccer, which, however excellent they may be as games, are not
popular games, truly so-called, in Tasmania.
Next. I
might just refer to the fact that the playing space needed for soccer
is very small indeed, and such a large area as the New Town ground
would be wasted on teams of eleven aside.
I should
also like to point out the fact that the T.F. League has given its
support to the forward movement of the Suburban Association, and its
liberal offer of financial assistance applies only to the ground in
question.
Finally, I wish to state that I do not ask
for any unfairness to any association; but it is not compulsory for the
highest tender to be accepted, and I think that such an advance, as is
proposed, ought not to be retarded by the question of a few shillings
to be gained by accepting another tender.
Yours, etc., UNIVERSITY.
No comments:
Post a Comment